About your Search

20121006
20121014
Search Results 0 to 11 of about 12 (some duplicates have been removed)
. that is different than it is economy where we punish people for doing well. i wish the president's economic policies are based on that premise and clearly they are not he said we need a 100,000 new teacher classroom is it the responsibility of the federal government to hire teacher a local school board? your schools are your responsibility in your community and state. there is nothing in the federal constitution that said the federal government ought to hire teachers for you. if you think you need more teachers hire them in your local level and let your school board decide who they are and what they teach. it was not just what the cand date said that made the difference body language that spoke volumes. you can see the difference. mitt romney spoke to the president and looked at him. unfortunately, the president never looked back and as you can see through most of the debate people who watched it were stun tod see the president seemingly unable and unwilling tine look at his opponent mitt romney. he looked down and around. i think he was looking for the exit. i am pretty sure that is what he was loo
to reward people who are doing well. it's different in the economy where we punish people who are doing well. i wish the president's education policies are based on that premise, clearly they're not. when he talks about, we need to put 100,000 new teachers in the classroom, i just asked myself. when is it the responsibility the federal government to go hire teachers for a local school board. your schools are your responsibility in your community. and in your state. and there's not one thing in the federal government constitution that says that the federal government ought to hire teachers for you, if you think you need more teachers, then you ought to hire them at your local level and let your school board decide who they are and what they teach. it wasn't just-- (applause) >> what the candidates said by the way that made the difference, i think it was their body language that spoke volumes. you're watching the split scene and see the difference. when mitt romney spoke to the president, he spoke to the president, looked at him. unfortunately the president never looked back and as you can se
the idea of being dem ma goinged and put down by a president who doesn't even understand how the economy works. >> mike: what do you add to that? it is pretty blunt. what steve wynn is saying that i heard so many business owners say. the recentment is not just being denigrated by the president but the fact that he doesn't seem to understand how jobs get created in the first place. not by some government grant or stimulus program but people who have the guts to take the risk to start a business often taking every dime of their personal save is, mortgaging their house and putting everything they ever owned and hoped to own on the line to create a business and if it fails ungle sugar is not there to bail them out and make it somehow feel better. they have to suck it up and start all over again. and some of them, not many but some of them end up being dog gone successful and pay taxes through the kazoo all their whole life and then to have created jobs to have put people to work to have every week sweated out whether they will have enough money to meet the payroll and then have the president
Search Results 0 to 11 of about 12 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)